The Life and Letters of Maria Edgeworth, Volume 1 — A Reader’s Guide

(9 User reviews) 2070

In Category - Fantasy Juvenile Worlds

Authors: Edgeworth, Maria, 1768-1849, Hare, Augustus J. C. (Augustus John Cuthbert), 1834-1903 [Editor] Published By : Project Gutenberg In Year : 2005

Key Word: Edgeworth, Maria, 1768-1849; Novelists, Irish -- 19th century -- Biography Target Reader: Readers of public-domain and historical texts

Book Edition: Project Gutenberg digital edition Book Language: en

Edition facts

Words: 98,760

Reading time: 430 min

Text sections: 8

Source: Project Gutenberg record #8825

This volume collects Maria Edgeworth's letters and biographical notes, edited by Augustus J.C. Hare. The excerpts reveal her sharp critical voice, self-deprecating humor, and vivid social observations, from literary judgments to witty anecdotes about London society.

File: pg8825

Maria Edgeworth’s letters, as assembled in this first volume, offer a direct record of her literary judgments and social observations. The editor, Augustus J.C. Hare, frames the collection by noting Edgeworth’s own reluctance to write a biographical preface—she considered her domestic life unremarkable. Yet the correspondence reveals a sharp critical intelligence: Edgeworth dismisses Sir John Hawkins’s biography of Johnson as “a heap of rubbish,” and she confesses to weeping over The Simple Story while finding her own novel Belinda “cold tameness.” These remarks, scattered among accounts of visits and witticisms, show a writer who judged both others and herself with unsparing clarity.

A Critical Voice in Private Letters

Edgeworth’s letters are punctuated by frank literary assessments. She writes of reading The Simple Story for the fourth time, intending to critique it, but instead being “carried away” and weeping over the characters. In the same breath, she turns to correcting Belinda and finds it so insipid that she quotes a hackney coachman: “Mend you! better make a new one.” This juxtaposition—emotional engagement with another’s work versus impatience with her own—recurs throughout the excerpts. She also dismisses Sir John Hawkins’s biography of Johnson as “rubbish” that would have smothered a lesser genius. These judgments are not delivered as formal criticism but as asides, revealing a mind constantly evaluating narrative power and authenticity.

Social Scenes and Witty Exchanges

The letters capture Edgeworth’s social world through anecdote and dialogue. She reports a dinner where someone asks if Lydia White is a bluestocking; Lord Norbury replies “Morbleu.” Edgeworth recounts a day spent learning a method of drawing the human figure, which she calls “ineffectual conjuring tricks,” and notes her father’s impatience. She describes a bevy of wits—Chenevix, Hamilton, Foster, Fitzgerald—and later receives a letter from Mrs. Apreece in Edinburgh, “charmed with all the wits there.” These vignettes are not mere name-dropping; they show Edgeworth’s ear for dialogue and her ability to sketch a scene with dry humor. The reader sees her as both participant and observer, a novelist collecting material.

Pace and Self-Awareness in the Correspondence

The rhythm of the letters shifts between brisk social report and reflective literary commentary. A letter from November 30 moves from a list of visitors to a quip about bluestockings, then to a detailed account of a failed drawing lesson. Another letter begins with a visit to Sonna and Pakenham Hall, then pivots to a passionate reading of The Simple Story. Edgeworth is aware of her own reactions: she intended to read as a critic but was “totally incapable.” This self-awareness extends to her own work, as she contrasts the emotional power of The Simple Story with the “cold tameness” of Belinda. The letters thus offer a double portrait: the public figure moving through society and the private writer measuring herself against her peers.

Readers approaching this volume should attend to the interplay between Edgeworth’s social anecdotes and her literary judgments. The letters are not a continuous narrative but a mosaic of moments, each revealing a different facet of her voice. Hare’s editorial thread is minimal, allowing Edgeworth’s own words to dominate. The result is a portrait built from fragments—witty, critical, and unexpectedly vulnerable.